Assessment, Evaluation, & Research
ACUI offers resources to help members conducting assessment on campus and guidelines for the work of those researching the profession.
Program Review Collaborative
In 2024, ACUI announced a partnership with ACUHO-I, NASPA, and NIRSA to form the Program Review Collaborative (PRC).
The joint initiative is aimed at enriching departmental reviews through the guidance of seasoned experts. For ACUI, it will become the next generation of its College Unions and Student Activities (CUSA) Evaluation Program. These associations bring together a wealth of knowledge, resources, and a unified commitment to advancing the work of campus professionals and institutions alike.
What benefits do PRC reviews provide?
PRC reviews focus on appraising the strengths and opportunities of a department, with particular emphasis on staffing, administrative processes, programmatic offerings, student engagement mechanisms, and collaborative ventures within the broader campus community. PRC reviews can serve to endorse exemplary practices, instigate constructive evolution within departments, and foster innovation.
What distinguishes PRC reviews?
The PRC offers expert-led comprehensive departmental reviews tailored to the unique needs of your institution. Reviewers are identified and vetted through our organizations and serve as trusted advisors as you navigate the review process.
To learn more about how the PRC can support your campus or how you can apply to become a PRC reviewer, contact Steve Chaplin.
EXAMPLES OF projects
Potential projects you may consider:
- Evaluating how current facilities, services, and procedures are meeting student needs and are aligned with trends in the college union field.
- Completing a comprehensive departmental external review using functional area standards as part of an institution’s assessment schedule.
- Assessing staffing resources, organizational structure, departmental alignment, and position descriptions to best achieve the unit’s mission.
- Recommending programmatic needs to support increased demands related to student organizations, leadership training, and risk management for campus events.
- Identifying how a department can improve communication and collaboration to prepare for the opening of a new student union facility.
- Providing objective insights on how to manage financial resources to achieve the strategic goals of the organization.
Research Agenda
ACUI’s research agenda is focused on the development and dissemination of knowledge that supports the work of college union and student activities professionals, creates theoretical frameworks that inform practice, addresses gaps in literature, and links practitioner and scholar.
The Association’s research agenda is aligned with the strategic direction of the Association and responsive to issues facing the profession with the goal of contributing to and improving the work of college union and student activities professionals. If you are interested in conducting research, you can find more about the guidelines and contact Steve Chaplin to get started.
CAS Standards & Guidelines
CAS creates credible standards, guidelines, and self-assessment guides that help campus leaders design and evaluate programs and services.
With increased scrutiny over campus resources and department budgets, CAS tools help you benchmark current facilities and staffing, identify opportunities to improve student learning and operational success, and communicate the value of the union and activities to senior administrators.
Access Standards
Please login for details on how to access CAS Standards associated with your ACUI membership.
Research Request Guidelines
ACUI is committed to supporting and advancing scholarship in the college union and student activities field.
To that end, the following guidelines and procedures have been established for researchers interested in accessing ACUI’s membership for scholarly purposes. These research procedures guide requests for the process of systematic inquiry into the college union and student activities profession, acknowledging that some other assessment, evaluation, and data analysis projects might not apply.